Legal Opinion

Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Lakeview Enterprises, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1995No. S-5329, S-5763 and S-5819PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lakeview Enterprises, Inc. and Urban, Vienna, Phillip and Beverly Rahoi (collectively Lakeview) appeal the trial court’s directed verdict on their inverse condemnation claim against the Fairbanks North Star Borough (Borough). Lakeview also argues that the trial coui’t erroneously instructed the jury on Lakeview’s nuisance and negligence claims and erroneously limited the testimony of Lakeview’s expert. We affirm.

By cross-appeal, the Borough challenges the trial court’s denial of certain summary judgment motions and some of its trial rulings. The Borough…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Belluomini v. Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State, Department of Corrections v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API