Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania v. New Jersey
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 17, 1976No. 68 ORIGPublishedCited by 167 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The motions for leave to file bills of complaint in these cases are denied.
The complaints, which seek to invoke our original jurisdiction, filed by Pennsylvania against New Jersey, and by Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont against New Hampshire, rely on our decision last Term in Austin *662v. New Hampshire, 420 U. S. 656 (1975), in which we held the New Hampshire Commuters Income Tax unconstitutional.
In Austin, supra, the Court held that the New Hampshire tax violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Constitution. That law imposed a 4% tax on the New Hampshire-derived income…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Austin v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.