Legal Opinion
Stickney v. City of Saco
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 2, 2001PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Marion Stickney and William Casa-vant Jr. 1 appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritz-sche, /.), that (1) declared Tasker Lane in the City of Saco to be a public way; (2) granted the City of Saco a prescriptive easement in land beyond the paved area of Tasker Lane; and (3) dismissed plaintiffs’ § 1983 claim. William and Tammy Des-Jardins appeal from that portion of the court’s judgment concluding that Casavant has an easement, ten feet in width, on the portion of the DesJardinses’ property at which the parties share a common boundary. We disagree with…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
- McAfee v. ColeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Anderson v. Commissioner of the Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Glidden v. BeldenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Lyons v. Baptist School of Christian TrainingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Binkley v. Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Frederick B. Lincoln v. Harold Burbank IISupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Smith v. HawthorneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLC v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2002
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.