Legal Opinion

State v. Wynn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1923No. 17957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant was prosecuted, tried, and convicted in the superior court for Thurston county, of the crime of bootlegging, and judgment was thereupon pronounced, from which he appeals.

At the beginning of the trial, appellant orally demurred to the information on the ground that it stated no crime known to the code of the state of Washington; that it constitutes a statement of facts which, if proven, would be a bar to the action.

On appeal appellant urges that the information states no venue, and that therefore appellant was not legally convicted in the superior court for Thurston county, and that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HughlettWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. SpillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. MarselleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. GrayWashington Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. LitzenbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. HurlbertWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. BestolasWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API