Legal Opinion

State v. Bestolas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1930No. 22036. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

The defendants in this action were jointly charged with the crime of sodomy. The information contains two counts. In the first count, the defendant Brewer is charged with having carnal knowledge of the defendant Bestolas, and the defendant Bestolas is charged with having voluntarily submitted thereto. By the second count, the defendant Bestolas is charged with having carnal knowledge of the defendant Brewer, and the defendant Brewer is charged with having voluntarily submitted thereto. The defendants having pleaded not guilty, upon their trial, the jury found defendant Brewer guilty as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. State v. SpillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. MarselleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. GrayWashington Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. HummelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API