Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1915No. 12825PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered October 24, 1914, upon a trial and conviction of grand larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant was tried and- convicted of the crime of grand larceny, upon an information charging him as follows:

“He, the said Walter Scott, in the county of King, state of Washington, on the 30th day of May, 1914, $480 in money, of the value of $480 lawful money of the United States, the *297property of one Effie Carter, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously, take, steal and carry away, with intent to deprive and defraud said Effie Carter thereof.”

There are five assignments of error:

I. The first claim of error goes to the sufficiency of the evidence of the prosecution to make a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. State v. Wong QuongWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Atkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. People v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. RomoArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Douglas v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API