Legal Opinion

State v. Bowen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1928No. 21281. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant was charged by information, upon two counts, with having committed in Sno-homish county the crime of bootlegging and also the gross misdemeanor of transportation of liquor for sale.

Upon a trial on the information, and his plea of not' guilty, the jury found him guilty only of the felony of bootlegging.

Four assignments of error are relied upon for reversal: (1) in not granting appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence; (2) in giving instruction No. 4; (3) in denying appellant’s motion for judgment n. o. v.; and (4) in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. SpillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. JewettWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. LitzenbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API