Legal Opinion

State v. Litzenberger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1926No. 19891. Department OnePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•Tolman, C. J.

— Appellant was convicted upon a charge of bootlegging and appeals from the judgment and sentence.

Fourteen errors are assigned, most of which are argued only sufficiently to require us to consider them.

The first two assignments are directed to the admission of testimony as to the contents of a container which was not admitted in evidence and the refusal, on motion, to strike the same. At the time of these rulings, the container referred to had not been offered in evidence and, of course, the trial court could not then determine its admissibility. If, at the close of the state’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WynnWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. State v. AshbyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. State v. MessingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API