State v. Hughlett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
— Defendants were charged with bootlegging and were found guilty of unlawful possession, by a jury. They have appealed from the judgment of sentence.
During the trial, certain whiskey which had been taken at the time of the arrest was received in evidence, over the objections of the appellants. ; The sheriff, as a witness for the state, had previously.testified that he did .not have any warrant for the arrest of the appellants, nor did he have any search warrant.
It is necessary to recite some of the facts. For sometime before the arrest, as hereinafter stated, the sheriff and his deputies had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GibbonsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. SurryWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. McDowellWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. SymesWashington Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by98 opinions
- State v. RingerWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HehmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Rodarte Ex Rel. Rodarte v. City of RivertonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. DarstWashington Supreme Court · 1965
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.