Legal Opinion

Moore v. City of Middletown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2012No. 2010-1363PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.

*56{¶ 1} In this appeal, we return to territory recently visited in Clifton v. Blanchester, 131 Ohio St.3d 287, 2012-Ohio-780, 964 N.E.2d 414. There, we held that property owners asserting a regulatory-taking claim lack standing to bring a mandamus action against a municipality to compel appropriation when the affected property is outside the municipality’s corporate limits. Id. at ¶ 24 and 29.

{¶ 2} In this appeal, we are presented with a more complex question. The appellants here are property owners who allege that a foreign municipality rezoned land that lies in the municipality, but that is…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. ProgressOhio.org, Inc. v. JobsOhio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Holden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. Columbus (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Albanese v. Batman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Graham v. City of Lakewood, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API