Legal Opinion
H. D. Watts Co. v. Hauk
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1920PublishedCited by 9 opinions
FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County.— Hon. W. B. Garvin, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall
This cause involves the liability of complainant for the privilege tax imposed on foreign construction companies by section 4 of chapter 101 of the Acts of 1915, which provides as follows:
“Sec. 4. Be it further enacted, that each vocation, occupation, and business hereinafter named in this section is hereby declared to be a privilege, and the rate of taxation on such privilege shall be as hereinafter fixed, which privilege shall be paid to the county court clerk as provided by law for the collection of revenue.
*217“Each foreign construction company with its chief office outside of this State,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crenshaw v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- English v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- Memphis v. BingTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Pryor v. Marion CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union Carbide Corp. v. AlexanderTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Neuhoff Packing Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Tennessee Gas Co. v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Britt v. CookTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Dixie Finance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.