Legal Opinion

Britt v. Cook

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

The Comptroller of the City of Nashville appeals from a decree holding appellees not liable for the privilege tax imposed by the subsection of Section 4 of the Revenue Act of 1927, found on page 325', under the title “Produce Dealers.” Appellees brought this suit to enjoin collection of this special tax, alleging that they are dealers in all kinds of farm products, buying* and selling vegetables, fruits, etc., with a place of business in Nashville, who have paid a merchant’s privilege tax and an ad valorem tax, under the pertinent provisions of the Act, and therefore, deny liability for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Kansas City v. LorberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Rosenbaum v. City of NewbernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. H. D. Watts Co. v. HaukTennessee Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moto-Pep, Inc. v. McGoldrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ogle v. Tennessee Eastman Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Memphis Street Railway v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Moto-Pep v. McGoldrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Piedmont Oil Co. v. KennedyTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API