Legal Opinion

Pryor v. Marion County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM MARION. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Marion County. —HoN. Foss H. Mercer, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fentress

The question presented for determination is: Are judgments in condemnation proceedings pending upon appeal taxable?

At the April term, 1914, of the circuit court of Marion county complainant recovered a judgment for $55,918.38 against the Chattanooga & Tennessee River Power Company for her lands which had been appropriated and submerged by the building of a dam by the company across the Tennessee river at Hale’s Bar.

*401It appealed from this judgment to the court of civil appeals, and on October 17, 1914, that court rendered a judgment in favor of the complainant for $49,500. The company filed a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Cerecedo Hermanos Y CompañiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Crenshaw v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Union Insurance v. HogeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  5. English v. CrenshawTennessee Supreme Court · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chapdelaine v. TorrenceTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. H. D. Watts Co. v. HaukTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Neuhoff Packing Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Price-Bass Co. v. McCabeTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Chapdelaine v. TorrenceTennessee Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API