Neuhoff Packing Co. v. City of Chattanooga
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt
The Chancellor held that complainant was not liable for the privilege tax involved of $201.50, which amount the complainant had paid under protest. The defendant, City of Chattanooga, demurred to the bill.
The complainant is a wholesale meat dealer with its principal office in the city of Nashville. It appears that it employs two resident salesmen in 'the city of Chattanooga to solicit wholesale orders for meat from various dealers located within the city. These orders are forwarded by mail to complainant at Nashville, there filled and shipped in complainant’s trucks from its Nashville plant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trading Stamp Co. v. MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- H. D. Watts Co. v. HaukTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Snider v. McAteeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Pryor v. Marion CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gallagher v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Young Sales Corporation v. BensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
- Home Builders Association of Middle Tennessee v. Williamson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co. v. MoyersTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Morton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. MacFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.