Legal Opinion

Union Carbide Corp. v. Alexander

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

We granted Defendants’ Rule 11 application to consider the taxability, under Tennessee’s real property taxation statutes, T.C.A. § 67-5-501 et seq., of property owned by the United States in Anderson County, Tennessee. Defendants seek to tax a private corporation that manages and operates the Y-12 Plant under a contract with the United States. The specific issue in this case is whether Union Carbide Corporation owns an interest in the real property at the Y-12 Plant separate from the ownership interest of the United States. It is undisputed that the fee interest of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. City of Detroit v. Murray Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. County of FresnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Jackson C. O'dell, Iii, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. National Gas Distributors, Inc. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Covington Pike Toyota, Inc. v. CardwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Frank Rudy Heirs Associates v. Sholodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. United States v. Anderson County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API