Newhall v. Hatch
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
—The plaintiff loaned to the defendant Hatch the sum of fifty thousand dollars, November 10, 1891, for which Hatch, on that day, executed to him his promissory note, payable one day after its date. November 3, 1892, as security for the payment of four thousand dollars of said indebtedness, Hatch executed to the plaintiff a conveyance of certain lands in Alameda County, which was recorded in the office of the county recorder on the following day. This deed, though absolute in form, was intended as a mortgage, and on November 4, 1892, the plaintiff executed and delivered to Hatch a defeasance,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Los Angeles v. MellusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Lent v. MorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Keidatz v. AlbanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Blakemore v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.