Legal Opinion

Hanmer v. Wes Barrette Masonry

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1987No. C8-86-1099PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA), by majority decision, affirmed a compensation judge’s denial of benefits for temporary partial disability. We affirm.

Employee, a 29-year-old former professional hockey player, worked as a brick tender for employer Wes Barrette Masonry at a weekly wage of $447.30. He sustained two work-related back injuries, the first one on July 2, 1981, and the second on October 15, 1982. Following the second surgery, employee was no longer able to continue work as a brick tender because of his disability. By agreement, employee was paid 25%…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Lemieux v. MortensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Mayer v. Erickson DecoratorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Paine v. Beek's PizzaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Langa v. Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. O'Mara v. State of Minn./u. of M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Arouni v. Kelleher Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Krotzer v. Browning-Ferris/Woodlake Sanitation ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API