Legal Opinion

Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 28, 1978No. 48015PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

Certiorari upon the relation of Parten Machinery Company (Parten), employer, and Federated Mutual Insurance Company, its insurer, to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals awarding compensation to employee, John Fryhling, because of the aggravation of a previous industrial injury to his left wrist and hand while he was operating a turret lathe as a machinist for Parten. Relators challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the factual findings of employee’s work-related disability. Additionally, they challenge the court of appeals’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Golob v. Buckingham HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Fisher v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. In Re Trusts Created by Agreement With HarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Miller v. Norris CreameriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Miller v. Norris CreameriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ruether v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State Bank in Eden Valley v. Euerle Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Hanmer v. Wes Barrette MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Worden v. County of HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. In Re Estate of MagnusCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API