Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Erickson Decorators

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 16, 1985No. C4-85-84PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

In this case the employer-insurer filed a notice of intention to discontinue payment of temporary total disability compensation to the employee on the ground he had not cooperated with rehabilitation plans. Upon his objection to the discontinuance of payments, a compensation judge found that employee was entitled to temporary partial disability benefits between the date of discontinuance and the date of hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversed, substituting a finding that employee was not entitled to temporary total disability or to temporary partial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. French v. Minnesota Cash RegisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Wesley v. City of Detroit LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Redgate v. Sroga's Standard ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Johnson v. State, Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Hanmer v. Wes Barrette MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. O'Mara v. State of Minn./u. of M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Hanmer v. Wes Barrette MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API