Legal Opinion

Paine v. Beek's Pizza

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 31, 1982No. 82-172PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

The employer of respondent Jay C. Paine and its insurer appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals holding that respondent was entitled to temporary total disability payments for 350 weeks terminating on March 6, 1979 and was totally disabled after that date. In so doing, the court of appeals rejected relators’ contention that Paine had voluntarily left gainful employment and moved to an area in which, practically speaking, there were nonexistent employment opportunities for one with Paine’s disabilities. We, therefore, are confronted with the issue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Saenger v. Liberty Carton Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Fredenburg v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Henry v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Lemieux v. MortensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Kurrell v. National Con Rod, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hanmer v. Wes Barrette MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Krotzer v. Browning-Ferris/Woodlake Sanitation ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Reede v. State Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hanmer v. Wes Barrette MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Paine v. Beek's PizzaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API