Legal Opinion
McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 5, 1983No. C3-82-1146PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
By writ of certiorari, employer-relator Pan-O-Gold Baking Company and insurer-relator Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Pan-O-Gold) seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming an award of temporary total and permanent partial disability to Lyle H. McClish, employee-respondent. Pan-O-Gold challenges findings that McClish sustained back injuries and that he was totally disabled therefrom. It also claims that temporary total disability payments are subject to reduction under Minn.Stat. § 176.101, subd. 4 (1982) when the employee…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Saenger v. Liberty Carton Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Egeland v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Wilken v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Redgate v. Sroga's Standard ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Brown v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.