Legal Opinion
Langa v. Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 14, 1992No. C4-91-403PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
Employer Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Company and its insurer Old Republic Insurance Company seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming an award of custodial day care benefits to employee Richard Lan-ga. At issue is whether Langa is entitled to custodial day care benefits pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 176.102, subd. 9(c) (1990). We reverse.
The facts of this case are not in dispute. On August 16, 1988 Langa sustained a severe compensable injury to his right *36knee. Despite four intervening surgical procedures intended to restore use of his knee,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norby v. Arctic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Hanmer v. Wes Barrette MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Johnson v. Paul's Auto & Truck Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Rippentrop v. Imperial Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Vait v. Merillat IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Hirsch v. Bartley-Lindsay Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Jerde v. Adolfson and PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Botler v. Wagner GreenhousesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Monteith v. Dobbs Pro StaffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.