Bryan v. T. A. Loving Co. & Associates
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The hearing Commissioner, through a very interesting and persuasive process of reasoning, comes to the conclusion that the deceased was for all practical purposes on the premises of his employer; that his employment involved unusual risks; and that, therefore, the injury arose out of and in the course of the employment. The Full Commission supplements this conclusion by finding that he was in the ambit of his employment and affirms. Thus, it affirmatively appears that the award was not made upon the theory that the deceased had begun his employment for the day or was actually engaged in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Lockey v. . Cohen, Goldman Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Barnett v. Britling Cafeteria Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Robbins v. Bossong Hosiery Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Starr v. Charlotte Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.