Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Britling Cafeteria Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1932No. 6 Div. 140PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, C.' L

It is undisputed that the plaintiff was an employee of the defendant at the time of her injury and was within the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1923, §§ 7534-7597), but the controverted question is, Was she acting within the line and scope of her employment at the time she was injured?

The proof shows that she sustained her injury by slipping on the sidewalk immediately in front of the defendant’s place of business and while on her way to report for duty and just before entering the way used by all employees for the purpose of discharging the duties to which they were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Industrial Commission v. BarberOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Jett v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Benoit Coal Mining Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Greydanus v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Nelson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Bryan v. T. A. Loving Co. & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Jaynes v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Frost v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API