Lockey v. . Cohen, Goldman Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The trial judge concluded that the facts found by the Commission established as a matter of law the right of the plaintiff to recover. In this there was error. Even if it be conceded that the facts found will support the conclusion that the plaintiff’s injury resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, this is not the only reasonable conclusion that may be drawn therefrom. This being true, and the Commission being the judge of the credibility, weight and sufficiency of the testimony, its conclusion must stand. While it was said in Singleton v. Laundry Co.,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Harden v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Hunt v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Chambers v. . Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Ridout v. Rose's 5-10-25c StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Taylor v. Twin City ClubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.