Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from ihe District Court of Oklahoma County; before B. F. Burwell, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The plaintiff in error was prosecuted and convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county for the crime of conducting certain games denounced under the statute prohibiting gambling. The information charged that the defendant did “Commit the crime of running a gambling house in manner and form as follows, for that the said defendants, Wm. Bolwine and Cecil Proctor, did, then and there unlawfully conduct as owners certain games of faro, monte, poker, roulette and craps, the same being banking and percentage games played with dice, cards and other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. LungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Sweitzer v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  4. Jones v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TobinWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bird v. WebberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API