People v. Lung
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant, Sam Lung, was accused by information of having carried on and conducted the game of tan for money, etc.; he was convicted as charged by a jury, and from the judgment against him, and an order refusing a new trial, he appealed.
As we understand section 330 of the Penal Code, it means that every person whatsoever who deals, plays, or carries on, or opens or causes to be opened, or who conducts, certain games therein mentioned, “ for money, checks, credit, or any other representative of value, is punishable by fine of not less than two hundred nor more than one thousand…
2Cited by23 opinions
- State v. TobinWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. BarnnovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Sullivan v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. Ong GitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.