Legal Opinion

People v. Carroll

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1889No. 20540PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The information in this case charges as follows: “That said P. J. Carroll did, on the seventh day of October, 1887, at and in said county of Fresno, state of California, and prior to the filing of this information, willfully and unlawfully open, carry on, and conduct for money a certain banking game, played with a certain device, to wit, a wheel marked with numbers and colors, said game being then and there a banking game commonly known as the ‘ wheel of fortune,’ contrary to the form, force, and effect of the statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State v. MannOregon Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Smith v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. State v. TobinWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. ClayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. People v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Sullivan v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API