Legal Opinion

Jones v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Hrror from the District Court of Oklahoma County. Prosecution for permitting gambling tables to be set up and used for tbe purpose of gambling in a house occupied by the defendant, in his possession and under his control.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Taesnbt, J.:

This case was commenced in the probate court of Oklahoma county, on information filed by the county attorney, in which the defendant was charged with “permitting gambling in a house under his control in manner and form as follows: For that he did permit gambling tables, to-wit: Craps, faro and poker tables, to be set up and used for the purpose of gambling in a room, to-wit: In the lower story of what is commonly known as the Bassett block in Oklahoma City, in said county and territory, by him, the said defendant, then occupied and of which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweitzer v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morris v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. People v. TomskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Everhart v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. Anderson v. BowenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Proctor v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API