Brown v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Appeal from Tulsa County Court; N. J. Gubser, Judge. David Brown was convicted of conducting a poker game, and he appeals. Citing Proctor v. Territory, 18 Oída. 378, and People v. Carroll, 80 Cal. 153.
1Opinion of the Court
ARMSTRONG, Judge.
The plaintiff in error was tried on an information in the county court of Tulsa county, and judgment rendered against him on the 16th day of September, 1908, on a charge of conducting a poker game. His punishment was fixed at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for 30 days, and he has perfected his appeal to this court.
The only question we shall consider in this record is the sufficiency of the information, the charging part of which is as follows:
“That on the 14th day of June, 1908, in Tulsa county, state of Oklahoma, Dave Brown, late of said county, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Proctor v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. TobinWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Staley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.