Legal Opinion
Johnson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 7, 1914No. A-1747PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma County; ■ John W. Hayson, Judge. Elmer Johnson and John Garrett were convicted of gaming, and appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
The plaintiffs in error, Elmer Johnson and John Garrett, were convicted at the March, 1912, term of the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of conducting a roulette game, and their punishment fixed at a fine of $500 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 60 days.
The information upon which the conviction is based is as follows:
“In the name and by the authority of the state of Oklahoma comes now Sam Hooker, the duly qualified and acting county attorney in and for Oklahoma county, and state of Oklahoma, and on his official oath gives the county court in and for said Oklahoma…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. WakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. LungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TobinWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Staley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Middleton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956