Legal Opinion
City of Yakima v. Gorham
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1939No. 27553. En BancPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.
The defendant was charged with, and convicted of, the violation of section one of ordinance B-301 of the city of Yakima, which provides:
“It shall be unlawful for any person to walk back and forth, loiter or remain upon the streets, alleys or sidewalks in front of any business house or industrial plant in the city of Yakima, Washington, or at or in close proximity to the rear or side entrances of such place of business or walk around such place of business or industrial plant for the purpose of persuading or intimidating any person from entering said place of business for the purpose of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Fenske Bros. v. Upholsterers International Union of North America, Local No. 18Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Krystad v. LauWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Nolan v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Gazzam v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 286 v. Sand Point Country ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.