Krystad v. Lau
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Extremes beget extremes; violence, in act or attitude, induces violence. Action in the affairs of men—as in the world of physics—tends to produce an equal and opposite reaction.
Respondent David Lau, an American citizen of Chinese ancestry, will have nothing to do with the Laundry and Dye Works Drivers’ Union, Local 566. He says in his affidavit that, in 1947, when he and his wife, Kow May Lau, began the laundry business, members of the union threatened him with physical violence. Respondent David Lau says that he sought to join the union but it refused him membership because of his oriental…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262 v. GazzamSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Bravo v. Dolsen CompaniesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.