Legal Opinion
Lenci v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1964No. 36589PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
Plaintiffs (respondents), owners of four motor vehicle wrecking yards in Seattle, instituted a declaratory judgment proceeding by which they challenged the constitutionality of § 338 Seattle Ordinance No. 90316. Section 338, in pertinent part, provides:
“The activities of a Motor Vehicle Wrecker shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building, or on premises enclosed by a view obscuring, firm and substantial fence or a solid wall, at least eight (8) feet high, and no motor vehicle or part of a motor vehicle acquired or purchased in the course of such business shall be parked, stored or…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Ohio Ex Rel. Clarke v. DeckebachSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Bacich v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1936
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Bloom v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.