Legal Opinion
Nolan v. Snohomish County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 20, 1990No. 25532-1-IPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.
Appellants Paul Nolan and Woodland Homes, Inc. (hereinafter Nolan), appeal the trial court's dismissal of a petition for writ of review and/or mandamus, in which they sought review of the Snohomish County Council's decision in a land use matter. The Council had affirmed the hearing examiner's decision to deny Nolan's plat application and vacate a mitigated determination of nonsignificance in a development proposed by Nolan. The trial court dismissed Nolan's petition on the grounds that he had failed to timely join an indispensable party, the County Council, and had failed to follow State…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lemon v. LanglieWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Cathcart-Maltby-Clearview Community Council v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Veradale Valley Citizens' Planning Committee v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Foothills Development Co. v. Clark County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Bradford v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2008
- Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Worthington v. WestNETWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- CITY OF DOTHAN PERSONNEL BD. v. DeVaneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.