Legal Opinion
Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 27, 1987No. 12854PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
This appeal involves the dismissal by the Superior Court of the plaintiff Connecticut Bank and Trust Company’s (CBT) appeal from an order of the commission on human rights and opportunities (CHRO). The Superior Court dismissed CBT’s administrative appeal on the ground that CBT had failed to comply with the service of process requirements of General Statutes § 4-183 (b),1 by not serving the complainant, Dolores Mikos, with a copy of the appeal petition. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in finding that a complainant before the CHRO is a “party of record” under General…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ardmare Construction Co. v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Gauvin v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Lieberman v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Summit Hydropower Partnership v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.