Legal Opinion

Summit Hydropower Partnership v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 3, 1993No. 14618; 14619PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the proceedings before an administrative agency, wherein the agency denied the plaintiffs request for state water quality certification for a proposed hydroelectric facility, constituted a “contested case” under General Statutes § 4-166 (2). The plaintiff, Summit Hydropower Partnership, filed an administrative appeal in the Superior Court from a decision of the named defendant,1 the commissioner of environmental protection (commissioner), denying its request for water quality certification. The commissioner based his denial on his determination…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Rybinski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Park City Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. In re Baby Z.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Cannata v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API