Legal Opinion
Huntington Continental Townhouse Ass'n v. Miner
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 2014No. G049624PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Introduction
The Orange County Superior Court, after a decision by the appellate division (Huntington Continental Town House Assn., Inc. v. Miner (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th Supp. 13 [167 Cal.Rptr.3d 609] (Huntington Continental)), certified this case for transfer to this court pursuant to rule 8.1005(a)(1) of the California Rules of Court to address a single question. The question is whether a homeowners association is required by the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Civ. Code, § 4000 et seq.) (the Davis-Stirling Act) to accept partial payments from an owner of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Ste. Marie v. Riverside County Regional Park & Open-Space DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Tarrant Bell Property, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Williams, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Walker v. City of San ClementeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Moore, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Dimacali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Bird Rock Home Mortgage v. Breaking GroundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.