Legal Opinion

Walker v. City of San Clemente

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 2015No. G050552PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

The Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, § 66000 et seq.; Act) 1 authorizes a local agency to impose fees on specific development projects to defray the cost of new or additional public facilities that are needed to serve those developments. The Act establishes a variety of requirements to ensure local agencies timely use these fees to pay for public facilities that serve those very developments rather than divert the fees for general revenue purposes. For example, when establishing a development fee, a local agency must identify both how it will use the fee and the relationship…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ehrlich v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Garrick Development Co. v. Hayward Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Mountain Defense League v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boatworks, LLC v. City of Alameda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Boatworks, LLC v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Cal. Resources Production Corp. v. Antioch City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. City of Hesperia v. Lake Arrowhead Community Services Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. County of El Dorado v. Super Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API