Ste. Marie v. Riverside County Regional Park & Open-Space District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
We address today a question of statutory interpretation, the answer to which will have a profound effect on how regional park and open space districts can manage their real property holdings. The dispute in this case centers on a purported conflict between Public Resources Code 1 section 5565, which suggests real property is deemed “dedicated” for park or open space purposes at the moment of acquisition by a district, and section 5540, which suggests land is “actually dedicated” only after a district’s board of directors adopts a formal resolution for such purposes. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Lopez v. Sony Electronics, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Price v. Starbucks Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.