Legal Opinion

Ste. Marie v. Riverside County Regional Park & Open-Space District

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2009No. S159319PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

We address today a question of statutory interpretation, the answer to which will have a profound effect on how regional park and open space districts can manage their real property holdings. The dispute in this case centers on a purported conflict between Public Resources Code 1 section 5565, which suggests real property is deemed “dedicated” for park or open space purposes at the moment of acquisition by a district, and section 5540, which suggests land is “actually dedicated” only after a district’s board of directors adopts a formal resolution for such purposes. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Lopez v. Sony Electronics, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Price v. Starbucks Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API