Legal Opinion

Tarrant Bell Property, LLC v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2011No. S179378PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We granted review in this case to decide whether, under Code of Civil Procedure section 638, 1 a trial court has discretion to refuse to enforce a predispute agreement providing that, in the event of dispute, a referee may hear and decide certain contested issues. The Court of Appeal held that a trial court has such discretion and that the trial court here properly exercised that discretion on the facts of this case. We agree with the Court of Appeal’s holding and affirm its judgment.

Factual Background

In October 2008, 120 current and former lessees and residents of a mobilehome…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Adoptions v. Robert E.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Jones v. Tracy School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Renda v. NevarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Diaz v. Grill Concepts Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Santa Clara County Correctional Peace Officers' Ass'n v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. McCaffrey Group, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API