Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
This is a public utility rate case.
The appellant, The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (Bell), in December, 1972 and January, 1973 *335filed tariffs with The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) which increased Bell’s annual revenues $56,417,000 for non-toll services to be effective February 7, 1973, and $3,386,700 for toll services to be effective January 22, 1973, or a total of $59,803,700 at the December 31, 1972 level of operations. The Commission allowed the tariff respecting toll services to become effective as proposed. The tariff revisions for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Penn Sheraton Hotel v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boston Edison Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Narragansett Electric Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Pittman v. PUB. SERV. COM'NMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.