Legal Opinion

Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1975No. Appeal, No. 278 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This is a public utility rate case.

The appellant, The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (Bell), in December, 1972 and January, 1973 *335filed tariffs with The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) which increased Bell’s annual revenues $56,417,000 for non-toll services to be effective February 7, 1973, and $3,386,700 for toll services to be effective January 22, 1973, or a total of $59,803,700 at the December 31, 1972 level of operations. The Commission allowed the tariff respecting toll services to become effective as proposed. The tariff revisions for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Penn Sheraton Hotel v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Narragansett Electric Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Pittman v. PUB. SERV. COM'NMississippi Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API