Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 18, 1981No. Appeal, No. 1509 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Williams, Jr.,
Metropolitan Edison Company (Met-Ed) has appealed from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) directing the company to refund to its ratepaying customers a total sum of $4,657,955.
On March 15, 1976, the Commission filed against Met-Ed a Complaint and Investigation Upon Commission Motion. The complaint averred that components of the company’s fuel cost adjustment surcharge passed on or charged to its ratepayers may have been unjust, unreasonable or unlawful, in that the surcharge may have been used to recover from customers excessive…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Coplay Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Equitable Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Exxon Pipeline v. La Public Service Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Braun v. McKay (In Re McKay)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.