Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 15, 1966No. Appeals, Nos. 92 to 117, inclusive, and 119PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, P. J.,
This rate proceeding began when Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. filed tariffs increasing Columbia’s gross revenue by some $6.5 million or about 9%. Complaints against the proposed increase were filed by the commission, the City of Pittsburgh, County of Allegheny, Borough of Ambridge, Borough of Canonsburg and eleven industrial consumers. The commission suspended the proposed rates for a period of nine months (July 28, 1964 to April 28, 1965). Further, the commission provided that the existing rates should continue in effect after April 28, 1965 as temporary rates,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Pike County Light & Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Richard A. Williams and Alfred S. Trask v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia, Leonard N. Bebchick and Daniel W. Gottlieb v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. D.C. Transit System, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Rhode Island Consumers' Council v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.