Schnebly v. Rehmke
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Kauffman, J., entered June 4, 1913, in favor of the plaintiffs, after striking a complaint in intervention.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Plaintiffs began this action against some one hundred and eighteen defendants. The issue involved was the use of the waters of a flowing stream, in Kittitas county, for irrigation and domestic use. The case was set for trial on Monday, June 2, 1913. On Saturday, the 31st day of May, appellant asked, and was granted, an ex parte order allowing him to file a complaint in intervention. The complaint was served and filed before the case was called for trial. The contesting parties and their witnesses were present on June 2 and ready for trial, but for the injection of the issue tendered by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. Huron Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
- Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Muhlenberg v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Murne v. Schwabacher Bros. & Co., Washington Territory1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- Langston v. HoytSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Longmire v. Yakima Highlands Irrigation & Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917