Muhlenberg v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thomas Cabboll, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
White, J.
The original action in which this intervention was filed was begun May 27, 1898, by Erancis B. Muhlenberg against the city of Tacoma and its treasurer. A large number of warrants were assigned to' Muhlenberg for the purpose of enabling him to bring the action. In his complaint he ashed that the warrants held by him be declared to be valid obligations of the city of Tacoma, *38and that the city and its treasurer be enjoined from using the revenues of the city arising from taxes, licenses, and fines for payment of debts of the city contracted since…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Bardsley v. SternbergWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Hewitt v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- W. B. King & Co. v. T. B. & Ins.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
- Newsome v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bamforth v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Williams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Turner v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Dodge v. ScrippsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.