Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Huron Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1892No. 437PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

Appellant’s right to sue cannot be questioned, as he was the trustee named in the mortgage, and was the proper party to institute a foreclosure, whether he held the legal title to any of the notes or not.

The court below found the mortgage, which covered both real and personal property, to be void as against the creditors of the Huron Lumber Company, because after the execution of the mortgage, which was made to secure preexisting debts, the company, by agreement with the appellant, or rather his cestui que trust, the Boston National Bank,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Bristol Milling & Manufacturing Co. v. ProbascoIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Nyman v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. American Discount Corp. v. Saratoga West, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Conover v. HullWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Benner v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Terhune v. WeiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Nixon v. Joshua Hendy Machine WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1909

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API