Coffey v. Greenfield
California Supreme Court
Appeal by the intervenor, Philip Hiffner, from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, in the Second District Court, County of Butte. Keyser, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Sharpstein, J.:
The appellant Heffner filed his petition in intervention in this action, which was demurred to and the demurrer sustained, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of intervention. The intervenor failed to amend, and judgment was entered against him, from which he appeals.
*383The intervenor alleges that he lent to the defendant a certain sum, and took as security a mortgage upon the premises involved in this action; that default was made in the payment of the sum so secured, the mortgage was foreclosed, the property sold and purchased at the…
2Cited by28 opinions
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Moreland v. Monarch Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.