Legal Opinion

Longmire v. Yakima Highlands Irrigation & Land Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1917No. 13653PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Preble, J., entered March 21, 1916, in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to enjoin the diversion of the waters of a creek used for irrigation purposes, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

By this action, the plaintiffs sought to have the defendant restrained from interfering with the flow of the *303water in Wenas creek. The trial resulted in a judgment restraining the defendant from impounding the waters of the creek for use upon nonriparian land. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.

Wenas creek is a small stream which rises on the east slope of the Cascade mountains, and flows in a southeasterly direction for a distance of forty or fifty miles, where it empties into the Yakima river. The valley through which this creek flows is from a quarter of a mile to a mile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gallatin v. Corning Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Domrese v. City of RoslynWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Still v. Palouse Irrigation & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Raser v. MoomawWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Schnebly v. RehmkeWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martha Lake Water Co. No. 1 v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Anderson v. Star-Bair Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Nevin v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Habermann v. Ellensburg Gas & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Ellensburg Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. City of EllensburgWashington Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API