Legal Opinion

Brink v. Reid

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1890No. 14,030PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellants declared on a promissory note executed by the appellee and George W. Johnson. The appellee’s answer as originally filed professed to be in bar of the action, and one of the paragraphs was the general denial. This answer was withdrawn and two of the paragraphs were verified and filed as pleas in abatement. They were filed after the change, over appellant’s objection, as pleas in abatement, and they unsuccessfully moved the court to reject them.

Our statute in very clear terms provides that pleas in .-abatement shall precede pleas in bar. R. S. 1881, section ■365. Its language is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Glidden v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State ex rel. Ruhlman v. RuhlmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Field v. MaloneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Watts v. SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Boland v. ClaudelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Roe v. DoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Euler v. EulerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API